Yamaha Mio 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Yamaha Mio 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Yamaha Mio 125: ~9.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (note: varies slightly by market variant and year) hp, ~93-96 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by variant) weight, top speed ~95 km/h (estimated; may vary by variant and market), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Yamaha Mio 125
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
9 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
9.6 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
93 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~9.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (note: varies slightly by market variant and year)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~9.6 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (note: varies slightly by market variant and year)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~95 km/h (estimated; may vary by variant and market)
175 km/h
Weight
~93-96 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by variant)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~45-55 km/L (approximately 1.8-2.2 L/100km, real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Yamaha Mio 125
7.0/10
"The sensible urban runabout that rarely disappoints if bought carefully."
Pros
+Extremely reliable, low maintenance
+Parts cheap and abundant
+Fuel sipping economy
Cons
−Weak above 90kph
−Soft suspension, bottoms easily
−CVT neglect very common
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
