Suzuki Burgman Street 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Burgman Street 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Suzuki Burgman Street 125: 8.7 hp @ 6,750 rpm hp, 104 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed 95 km/h (estimated; note: manufacturer does not officially publish top speed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Burgman Street 125
Suzuki Burgman 200
Horsepower (hp)
8.7 hp
18.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
10.2 Nm
16 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
104 kg
161 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
8.7 hp @ 6,750 rpm
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
10.2 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
95 km/h (estimated; note: manufacturer does not officially publish top speed)
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
Weight
104 kg (curb/wet weight)
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
35–40 km/L (approximately 2.5–2.9 L/100km, typical real-world average)
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Burgman Street 125
7.0/10
"Sensible, reliable urban tool that does exactly what's promised."
Pros
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Reliable Suzuki mechanicals
+Genuinely practical storage
Cons
−Gutless above 60mph
−Bland uninspiring character
−Cheap-feeling switchgear
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
