Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Burgman 200
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
18.5 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
16 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
161 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
175 km/h
Weight
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
