Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 400. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10. Suzuki Burgman 400: 31 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 222 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 155 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Burgman 200
Suzuki Burgman 400
Horsepower (hp)
18.5 hp
31 hp
Torque (Nm)
16 Nm
38 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
155 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
161 kg
222 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
31 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
38 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
155 km/h
Weight
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
222 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Suzuki Burgman 400
7.8/10
"The sensible scooter that actually delivers on every promise."
Pros
+Bulletproof engine longevity
+Massive underseat storage capacity
+Confident highway stability
Cons
−CVT belt needs regular attention
−Front brakes underwhelm hard stops
−Plastics scratch and crack easily
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
