Suzuki Address 110 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Address 110 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Suzuki Address 110: ~6.4 hp @ 7,000 rpm (note: approximate, varies slightly by market year) hp, ~89 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed ~95 km/h (estimated, note: real-world top speed may vary by market variant), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Address 110
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
6.4 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
8 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
89 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~6.4 hp @ 7,000 rpm (note: approximate, varies slightly by market year)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~8.0 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (note: approximate estimate)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~95 km/h (estimated, note: real-world top speed may vary by market variant)
175 km/h
Weight
~89 kg (curb weight)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.0 L/100km or ~50 km/L (typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Address 110
7.5/10
"The most sensible urban scooter money can buy used."
Pros
+Bulletproof fuel-injected reliability
+Enormous underseat storage
+Exceptional fuel economy
Cons
−CVT belt needs monitoring
−Uninspiring above 55mph
−Budget suspension on rough roads
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
