Piaggio Vespa Primavera 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 50
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Piaggio Vespa Primavera 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 50. Piaggio Vespa Primavera 50: ~3.0 hp @ 7,500 rpm (restricted moped version; note: unrestricted 50cc variant produces ~3.4 hp) hp, ~115 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed ~45 km/h (restricted for A1/moped compliance; unrestricted versions ~75 km/h), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Peugeot Kisbee 50: 3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws) hp, 95 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations), Motoryk rating 6.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Piaggio Vespa Primavera 50
Peugeot Kisbee 50
Weight (kg) — lower is better
Horsepower
~3.0 hp @ 7,500 rpm (restricted moped version; note: unrestricted 50cc variant produces ~3.4 hp)
3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws)
Torque
~4.0 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
3.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm — estimated
Top Speed
~45 km/h (restricted for A1/moped compliance; unrestricted versions ~75 km/h)
45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations)
Weight
~115 kg (curb weight)
95 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.0 L/100km or ~50 km/L (typical real-world average)
2.0 L/100km (approximately 50 km/L) — estimated
Individual Reviews
Piaggio Vespa Primavera 50
7.0/10
"A charming urban toy that demands realistic expectations before buying."
Pros
+Exceptional build quality throughout
+Timeless Italian styling holds value
+Bulletproof reliability when serviced
Cons
−30mph limit genuinely restricting
−Bodywork repairs cost serious money
−Neglected variators are very common
"Decent starter scooter if the history checks out clean."
Pros
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
+Decent parts availability
+Cheap insurance premiums
Cons
−Carb issues when neglected
−Fragile front bodywork plastics
−Variator wears prematurely
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
Affiliate · we may earn
