Piaggio Hexagon 250 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Piaggio Hexagon 250 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Piaggio Hexagon 250: 20 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated hp, 175 kg (wet/curb weight) — estimated weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Piaggio Hexagon 250
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
20 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
20 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
125 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
175 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
20 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
20 Nm @ 6,500 rpm — estimated
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
125 km/h
175 km/h
Weight
175 kg (wet/curb weight) — estimated
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L) — estimated
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Piaggio Hexagon 250
6.5/10
"Buy the best example you can afford, inspect everything twice."
Pros
+Generous underseat storage capacity
+Strong mid-range torque delivery
+Comfortable GT riding position
Cons
−Electrical reliability increasingly questionable
−Parts and specialists harder finding
−Cold-start carb issues common
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
