Peugeot Kisbee 50 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Peugeot Kisbee 50 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Peugeot Kisbee 50: 3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws) hp, 95 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations), Motoryk rating 6.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Peugeot Kisbee 50
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
3 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
3.5 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
45 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
95 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
3.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm — estimated
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations)
175 km/h
Weight
95 kg (wet/curb weight)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.0 L/100km (approximately 50 km/L) — estimated
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Peugeot Kisbee 50
6.0/10
"Decent starter scooter if the history checks out clean."
Pros
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
+Decent parts availability
+Cheap insurance premiums
Cons
−Carb issues when neglected
−Fragile front bodywork plastics
−Variator wears prematurely
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
