Peugeot Kisbee 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 100
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Peugeot Kisbee 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 100. Peugeot Kisbee 50: 3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws) hp, 95 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations), Motoryk rating 6.0/10. Peugeot Kisbee 100: ~6.1 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated) hp, ~108 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~95 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 5.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Peugeot Kisbee 50
Peugeot Kisbee 100
Horsepower (hp)
3 hp
6.1 hp
Torque (Nm)
3.5 Nm
7.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
45 km/h
95 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
95 kg
108 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
3 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately 2.2 kW — note: restricted to meet 45 km/h EU moped laws)
~6.1 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
Torque
3.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm — estimated
~7.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
45 km/h (restricted, as per EU moped regulations)
~95 km/h (estimated)
Weight
95 kg (wet/curb weight)
~108 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.0 L/100km (approximately 50 km/L) — estimated
2.0–2.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Peugeot Kisbee 50
6.0/10
"Decent starter scooter if the history checks out clean."
Pros
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
+Decent parts availability
+Cheap insurance premiums
Cons
−Carb issues when neglected
−Fragile front bodywork plastics
−Variator wears prematurely
Peugeot Kisbee 100
5.5/10
"Perfectly adequate urban scooter, but nothing you'll ever brag about."
Pros
+Dead simple mechanically
+Frugal fuel consumption
+Light and easy parking
Cons
−Cheap hollow plastics throughout
−Parts scarce outside Europe
−Brakes genuinely underwhelming
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
