Peugeot Citystar 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Peugeot Citystar 200 vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Peugeot Citystar 200: 16 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated hp, 155 kg (curb weight) — estimated weight, top speed 125 km/h — estimated, Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Peugeot Citystar 200
Suzuki Burgman 200
Horsepower (hp)
16 hp
18.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
16 Nm
16 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
125 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
155 kg
161 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
16 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
16 Nm @ 6,500 rpm — estimated
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
125 km/h — estimated
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
Weight
155 kg (curb weight) — estimated
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.2 L/100km (approx. 31 km/L) — estimated
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Peugeot Citystar 200
6.5/10
"Decent urban scooter if you buy carefully and budget for parts."
Pros
+Solid European build quality
+Excellent under-seat storage
+Composed, comfortable ride
Cons
−Parts availability is painful
−Dashboard electrics can fail
−Misleading displacement badging
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
