Kawasaki Brute Force 750 vs Kawasaki Z900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kawasaki Brute Force 750 vs Kawasaki Z900. Kawasaki Brute Force 750: ~46 hp @ 6,500 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish power figures for this model) hp, ~297 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~105 km/h (estimated; note: this is an ATV, not a motorcycle), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Kawasaki Z900: 125 hp @ 9,500 rpm hp, 214 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kawasaki Brute Force 750
Kawasaki Z900
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
125 hp
Torque (Nm)
62 Nm
98.6 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
105 km/h
225 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
297 kg
214 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
~46 hp @ 6,500 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish power figures for this model)
125 hp @ 9,500 rpm
Torque
~62 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (estimated; official figures not published by Kawasaki)
98.6 Nm @ 7,700 rpm
Top Speed
~105 km/h (estimated; note: this is an ATV, not a motorcycle)
225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced)
Weight
~297 kg (wet/curb weight)
214 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~11–14 L/100km (estimated real-world average under mixed riding conditions)
5.5–6.5 L/100km (approx. 15–18 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Kawasaki Brute Force 750
8.0/10
"Tough, capable, and forgiving — if the previous owner cared."
Pros
+Bulletproof V-twin engine
+Strong low-end torque
+Excellent parts availability
Cons
−Front diff neglect is common
−CVT belt wears fast
−Heavy for tight trails
Kawasaki Z900
8.5/10
"The used streetfighter benchmark that rivals struggle to beat at this money."
Pros
+Fantastic power-to-price ratio
+Chassis feedback genuinely excellent
+Parts and servicing affordable
Cons
−Pre-2020 forks underwhelming
−Vibes above 8,000rpm noticeable
−Wind protection essentially nonexistent
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
