Honda Hornet 900 vs Honda Cb900f Hornet
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Honda Hornet 900 vs Honda Cb900f Hornet. Honda Hornet 900: 109 hp @ 9,000 rpm hp, 196 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 220 km/h (estimated; note: Honda did not officially publish a top speed), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Honda Cb900f Hornet: 109 hp @ 9,000 rpm hp, 202 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 220 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Honda Hornet 900
Honda Cb900f Hornet
Horsepower (hp)
109 hp
109 hp
Torque (Nm)
91 Nm
91 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
220 km/h
220 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
196 kg
202 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
109 hp @ 9,000 rpm
109 hp @ 9,000 rpm
Torque
91 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
91 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
220 km/h (estimated; note: Honda did not officially publish a top speed)
220 km/h
Weight
196 kg (wet/curb weight)
202 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
6.0–7.5 L/100km (typical real-world average)
6.0–7.5 L/100km (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Honda Hornet 900
8.0/10
"A brilliant all-rounder that rewards buyers who choose carefully."
Pros
+Fireblade engine, naked price
+Bulletproof when serviced properly
+Surprisingly comfortable long-distance
Cons
−Thrashed examples are common
−Cam chain tensioner issues lurk
−Front end feels slightly vague
Honda Cb900f Hornet
8.2/10
"Honda's most sensible used buy — reliable, fast, and genuinely affordable."
Pros
+Bulletproof engine, genuinely maintenance-free
+Torquey midrange pulls everywhere
+Parts cheap and widely available
Cons
−Seat punishes long distances
−Mirrors vibrate, essentially decorative
−Rear suspension crude and tired
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
