Bmw R 1250 Rt vs Bmw K 1300 Gt
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Bmw R 1250 Rt vs Bmw K 1300 Gt. Bmw R 1250 Rt: 136 hp @ 7,750 rpm hp, 279 kg (wet/curb weight with full fluids, no optional luggage) weight, top speed 200 km/h (electronically influenced; estimated), Motoryk rating 8.5/10. Bmw K 1300 Gt: 160 hp @ 8,750 rpm hp, 296 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 250 km/h (electronically limited), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Bmw R 1250 Rt
Bmw K 1300 Gt
Horsepower (hp)
136 hp
160 hp
Torque (Nm)
143 Nm
140 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
200 km/h
250 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
279 kg
296 kg
Type
Touring
Touring
Horsepower
136 hp @ 7,750 rpm
160 hp @ 8,750 rpm
Torque
143 Nm @ 6,250 rpm
140 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
200 km/h (electronically influenced; estimated)
250 km/h (electronically limited)
Weight
279 kg (wet/curb weight with full fluids, no optional luggage)
296 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (approximately 18.2 km/L, typical real-world average)
6.5 L/100km (approximately 15.4 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Bmw R 1250 Rt
8.5/10
"The best used touring motorcycle money can buy if inspected properly."
Pros
+ShiftCam engine is exceptional
+Wind protection genuinely class-leading
+Heated seats and grips standard
Cons
−Heavy in slow traffic
−Final drive spline wear expensive
−Dealer servicing costs hurt
Bmw K 1300 Gt
8.5/10
"The sport-tourer benchmark that still embarrasses newer rivals on pace."
Pros
+Thunderous inline-four engine
+Sophisticated Duolever handling
+Excellent long-distance comfort
Cons
−Expensive service intervals
−Heavy at low speeds
−ESA electronics age poorly
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
