Bmw C 650 Gt vs Suzuki Burgman 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Bmw C 650 Gt vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Bmw C 650 Gt: 60 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Bmw C 650 Gt
Suzuki Burgman 200
Horsepower (hp)
60 hp
18.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
62 Nm
16 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
261 kg
161 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
60 hp @ 7,500 rpm
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
62 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
175 km/h
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
Weight
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L typical real-world average)
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Bmw C 650 Gt
7.5/10
"The sensible scooter that secretly embarrasses proper motorcycles on commutes."
Pros
+Genuinely capable motorway cruiser
+Excellent storage capacity
+Smooth, refined engine character
Cons
−CVT belt replacement costs hurt
−Heavy at low speeds
−Electrical issues on older bikes
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
