Zero Fxs vs Zero Motorcycles Fx
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Zero Fxs
Zero Motorcycles Fx
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
46 hp
Torque (Nm)
106 Nm
106 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
132 kg
132 kg
Type
Electric
Dual-sport
Horsepower
46 hp (34 kW) — note: varies slightly by model year
46 hp @ peak (Z-Force 75-5 motor, no fixed RPM peak — note: electric motor, torque is constant across range)
Torque
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant torque from standstill)
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant, from standstill)
Top Speed
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight
132 kg (curb weight — note: varies slightly by battery configuration and model year)
132 kg (curb weight, ZF7.2 configuration — note: varies slightly by model year and battery configuration)
Fuel
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.0 kWh/100km (no fuel; electric only)
Equivalent to approximately 1.0–1.5 L/100km (energy use ~50–75 Wh/km typical real-world)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Zero Fxs
7.5/10
"Urban riding reimagined, but range limitations demand honest self-assessment first."
Pros
+Savage, instant city torque
+Near-zero running costs
+Featherlight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Range is genuinely limiting
−Battery degradation risk used
−Sparse dealer/service network
Zero Motorcycles Fx
7.8/10
"Best urban electric used buy if battery health checks out."
Pros
+Zero running costs realistically
+Instant torque, supremely fun
+Lightweight and genuinely agile
Cons
−Limited range on older packs
−Battery health critical to check
−Basic suspension, limited adjustment