Zero Fx vs Zero Motorcycles Fxe
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Zero Fx vs Zero Motorcycles Fxe. Zero Fx: 46 hp @ peak (continuous ~27 hp) — note: electric motors do not have a traditional RPM power peak hp, 138 kg (curb weight, 7.2 kWh battery configuration) weight, top speed 137 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Zero Motorcycles Fxe: 46 hp (34 kW) peak power hp, 142 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 137 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Zero Fx
Zero Motorcycles Fxe
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
46 hp
Torque (Nm)
106 Nm
106 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
138 kg
142 kg
Type
Electric
Dual-sport
Horsepower
46 hp @ peak (continuous ~27 hp) — note: electric motors do not have a traditional RPM power peak
46 hp (34 kW) peak power
Torque
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant peak torque from standstill)
106 Nm (instantaneous from 0 rpm)
Top Speed
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight
138 kg (curb weight, 7.2 kWh battery configuration)
142 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.5 L/100km (energy consumption ~80–100 Wh/km typical real-world)
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.5 kWh/100km (real-world urban use); range ~160 km city / ~100 km highway on 7.2 kWh pack
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Zero Fx
7.5/10
"Urban commuter perfection, but range anxiety is genuinely real."
Pros
+Savage instant torque delivery
+Featherlight supermoto handling
+Near-zero running costs
Cons
−Real range embarrassingly limited
−Battery degradation on older bikes
−Stock charging painfully slow
Zero Motorcycles Fxe
7.5/10
"Urban electric done right, if the mileage math works for you."
Pros
+Instant torque, genuinely fast
+Near-zero running costs
+Strong urban riding ergonomics
Cons
−Range limits longer rides
−Battery replacement eye-watering
−Suspension uninspiring beyond city
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
