Yamaha Freego 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Yamaha Freego 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Yamaha Freego 125: ~7.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm (NOTE: best estimate based on Yamaha Blue Core 125cc platform specs) hp, ~96 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~95 km/h (NOTE: best estimate; official figure not widely published), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Yamaha Freego 125
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
7.1 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
9.5 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
96 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~7.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm (NOTE: best estimate based on Yamaha Blue Core 125cc platform specs)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~9.5 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (NOTE: best estimate based on similar Yamaha 125cc Blue Core engines)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~95 km/h (NOTE: best estimate; official figure not widely published)
175 km/h
Weight
~96 kg (wet/curb weight)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~1.8 L/100km or ~55 km/L (estimated real-world average; NOTE: best estimate based on similar Blue Core 125cc Yamaha scooters)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Yamaha Freego 125
7.0/10
"Dependable urban workhorse that rewards sensible buyers over thrill-seekers."
Pros
+Bulletproof Blue Core engine
+Exceptional underseat storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Keyless ignition reliability concerns
−Vague suspension feedback
−Parts scarce outside Asia
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
