Ural Ct 750 vs Yamaha Xsr125
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ural Ct 750 vs Yamaha Xsr125. Ural Ct 750: ~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output) hp, ~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Yamaha Xsr125: 15 hp @ 10,000 rpm hp, 139 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~110 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ural Ct 750
Yamaha Xsr125
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
15 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
11.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
110 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
218 kg
139 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output)
15 hp @ 10,000 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 4,000 rpm (estimated)
11.5 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers)
~110 km/h
Weight
~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
139 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~6.5 L/100km (estimate; real-world varies significantly with riding conditions)
2.5 L/100km or ~40 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ural Ct 750
6.5/10
"Buy it for the lifestyle, not the motorcycle."
Pros
+Utterly unique riding experience
+Strong, loyal owner community
+2WD capability genuinely useful
Cons
−Constant mechanical attention required
−Sluggish 40hp performance
−Neglected examples are nightmares
Yamaha Xsr125
8.0/10
"The smartest 125 you can buy used, full stop."
Pros
+Sharp, confidence-inspiring handling
+VVA engine surprisingly capable
+Premium retro looks hold up
Cons
−Highway riding genuinely punishing
−Replacement bodywork costs hurt
−Limited used market availability
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
