Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 900 vs Lifan Sr200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 900 vs Lifan Sr200. Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 900: 55 hp @ 6,100 rpm hp, 220 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 177 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Lifan Sr200: ~15 hp @ 8,000 rpm — best estimate; official figures not widely published hp, ~145 kg (wet/curb weight) — best estimate; verify with regional spec sheet weight, top speed 115–125 km/h — best estimate based on engine class, Motoryk rating 5.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 900
Lifan Sr200
Horsepower (hp)
55 hp
15 hp
Torque (Nm)
80 Nm
15 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
177 km/h
115 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
220 kg
145 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
55 hp @ 6,100 rpm
~15 hp @ 8,000 rpm — best estimate; official figures not widely published
Torque
80 Nm @ 3,230 rpm
~15 Nm @ 6,500 rpm — best estimate
Top Speed
177 km/h
115–125 km/h — best estimate based on engine class
Weight
220 kg (wet/curb weight)
~145 kg (wet/curb weight) — best estimate; verify with regional spec sheet
Fuel
4.8 L/100km (approx. 20.8 km/L typical real-world average)
3.0–3.5 L/100km (approx. 28–33 km/L) — best estimate, official figures vary by market
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Triumph Bonneville Scrambler 900
7.8/10
"A genuinely rewarding used buy if you inspect carefully and pay fairly."
Pros
+Genuinely characterful parallel twin
+Stunning period-correct aesthetics
+Comfortable upright riding position
Cons
−Subframe vulnerable to crash damage
−Suspension mediocre off-road
−Pre-2016 fuelling can roughen
Lifan Sr200
5.5/10
"Decent budget starter if you buy smart and inspect thoroughly."
Pros
+Genuinely attractive retro styling
+Beginner-friendly power delivery
+Cheap entry price used
Cons
−Inconsistent quality control issues
−Electrical systems notoriously temperamental
−Parts sourcing still frustrating
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
