Sym Jet 14 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Sym Jet 14 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Sym Jet 14 125: 8.8 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately; note: some market variants may differ slightly) hp, 108 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 95–100 km/h (estimated; note: varies slightly by market tune and rider weight), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Sym Jet 14 125
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
8.8 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
9.5 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
108 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
8.8 hp @ 7,500 rpm (approximately; note: some market variants may differ slightly)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
9.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
95–100 km/h (estimated; note: varies slightly by market tune and rider weight)
175 km/h
Weight
108 kg (wet/curb weight)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.0–2.5 L/100km (approximately 40–50 km/L typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Sym Jet 14 125
7.0/10
"Dependable urban workhorse that rewards careful pre-purchase inspection."
Pros
+Solid build quality throughout
+Fuel injection starts reliably
+Helmet-swallowing underseat storage
Cons
−Fork seals weep early
−Zero motorway capability
−Dull, uninvolving handling feel
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
