Sym Fiddle 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Sym Fiddle 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Sym Fiddle 125: ~8–9 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated; varies by generation) hp, ~105–115 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by generation) weight, top speed ~95–100 km/h (estimated, may vary by generation and market), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Sym Fiddle 125
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
8 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
8 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
105 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~8–9 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated; varies by generation)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~8–9 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; varies by generation)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~95–100 km/h (estimated, may vary by generation and market)
175 km/h
Weight
~105–115 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by generation)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.0–2.5 L/100km (approx. 40–50 km/L, typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Sym Fiddle 125
6.5/10
"Dependable urban runabout if you inspect the drivetrain first."
Pros
+Proven reliable 125cc engine
+Comfortable upright riding position
+Reasonable parts availability
Cons
−Vague handling above 50mph
−Rust-prone steel undercarriage
−Variator neglect extremely common
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.









