Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which has more power?

Sym Citycom 300 produces 22 hp @ 7,500 rpm; Suzuki Burgman 650 produces 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm. Suzuki Burgman 650 wins by 34 hp.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which is faster?

Top speed: Sym Citycom 300 125 km/h, Suzuki Burgman 650 175 km/h. Suzuki Burgman 650 is the faster of the two.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which is lighter?

Weight: Sym Citycom 300 198 kg (wet/curb weight), Suzuki Burgman 650 261 kg (wet/curb weight). Sym Citycom 300 is lighter by 63 kg.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which is more fuel-efficient?

Fuel use: Sym Citycom 300 3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average), Suzuki Burgman 650 5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average). Real-world economy varies by rider weight, traffic, and how hard the throttle gets twisted.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which is more reliable?

Motoryk rates Sym Citycom 300 7.0/10 and Suzuki Burgman 650 8.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650 scores higher on the overall verdict. Sym Citycom 300 caveat: You need dealer support outside major cities. Suzuki Burgman 650 caveat: You crave sporty handling or hate automatic transmissions.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which is better for beginners?

Both are reasonable first-bike candidates. Sym Citycom 300: 22 hp. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650 — which should I commute on daily?

Sym Citycom 300 — Urban commuters wanting Japanese quality, Taiwanese pricing.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650

Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Sym Citycom 300: 22 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 198 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.