Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which has more power?

Sym Citycom 300 produces 22 hp @ 7,500 rpm; Suzuki Burgman 200 produces 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm. Sym Citycom 300 wins by 4 hp.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which is faster?

Top speed: Sym Citycom 300 125 km/h, Suzuki Burgman 200 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions). Suzuki Burgman 200 is the faster of the two.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which is lighter?

Weight: Sym Citycom 300 198 kg (wet/curb weight), Suzuki Burgman 200 161 kg (wet/curb weight).

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which is more fuel-efficient?

Fuel use: Sym Citycom 300 3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average), Suzuki Burgman 200 3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average). Real-world economy varies by rider weight, traffic, and how hard the throttle gets twisted.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which is more reliable?

Motoryk rates Sym Citycom 300 7.0/10 and Suzuki Burgman 200 7.2/10. Suzuki Burgman 200 scores higher on the overall verdict. Sym Citycom 300 caveat: You need dealer support outside major cities. Suzuki Burgman 200 caveat: You regularly need sustained highway cruising speeds.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which is better for beginners?

Both are reasonable first-bike candidates. Sym Citycom 300: 22 hp. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 — which should I commute on daily?

Sym Citycom 300 — Urban commuters wanting Japanese quality, Taiwanese pricing.

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200

Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers

Sym Citycom 300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Sym Citycom 300: 22 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 198 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.