Swm Silverback 400 vs Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Swm Silverback 400 vs Triumph Scrambler 400 X. Swm Silverback 400: approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Triumph Scrambler 400 X: 39.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 179 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed Approximately 160 km/h (est.), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Swm Silverback 400
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Horsepower (hp)
35 hp
39.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
35 Nm
37.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
160 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
165 kg
179 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
39.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
approximately 35 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
37.5 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
approximately 145 km/h (estimated)
Approximately 160 km/h (est.)
Weight
approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight)
179 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Approximately 3.2 L/100km (31 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Swm Silverback 400
6.5/10
"Capable niche adventurer ruined by catastrophic parts and dealer support."
Pros
+Proven Rotax-derived engine
+Capable off-road geometry
+Priced well below competitors
Cons
−Near-zero parts availability
−Negligible dealer support network
−Resale value stays low
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
7.5/10
"A genuinely premium small scrambler that rewards patient, realistic riders."
Pros
+Genuinely premium build quality
+Capable mild off-road manners
+Excellent low-speed torque
Cons
−Highway cruising gets tiring
−Dealer servicing costs hurt
−Neglected chains very common
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
