Suzuki V-strom 250 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 411
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki V-strom 250 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 411. Suzuki V-strom 250: ~24 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Royal Enfield Himalayan 411: 24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm hp, 199 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki V-strom 250
Royal Enfield Himalayan 411
Horsepower (hp)
24 hp
24.3 hp
Torque (Nm)
22 Nm
32 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
189 kg
199 kg
Type
Adventure
Adventure
Horsepower
~24 hp @ 8,000 rpm
24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm
Torque
~22 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
32 Nm @ 4,250 rpm
Top Speed
~145 km/h (estimated)
130 km/h
Weight
189 kg (wet/curb weight)
199 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.2 L/100km or ~31 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki V-strom 250
7.0/10
"Dependable urban workhorse that overpromises adventure and underdelivers speed."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Bulletproof engine reliability
+Comfortable upright riding position
Cons
−Breathless above 70mph
−Suspension degrades quickly
−Woeful stock windscreen
Royal Enfield Himalayan 411
7.5/10
"Slow, characterful, and brilliantly capable where pavement ends."
Pros
+Cheap parts and servicing
+Genuinely capable off-road
+Massive aftermarket support
Cons
−Vibration loosens fasteners constantly
−Early ECU fueling issues
−Weak stock electrics
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
