Suzuki Smash 115 vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Smash 115 vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub. Suzuki Smash 115: Approximately 8.5 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated) hp, Approximately 97–101 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by market variant) weight, top speed Approximately 110 km/h (estimated, may vary by market variant), Motoryk rating 7.2/10. Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub: 8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm hp, 118 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed Approximately 95–100 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Smash 115
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Horsepower (hp)
8.5 hp
8.8 hp
Torque (Nm)
8.8 Nm
11 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
110 km/h
95 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
97 kg
118 kg
Type
Commuter
Commuter
Horsepower
Approximately 8.5 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
Approximately 8.8 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
11 Nm @ 5,000 rpm
Top Speed
Approximately 110 km/h (estimated, may vary by market variant)
Approximately 95–100 km/h
Weight
Approximately 97–101 kg (wet/curb weight, varies by market variant)
118 kg (curb/wet weight)
Fuel
Approximately 1.7–2.0 L/100km (50–60 km/L typical real-world average)
Approximately 1.8–2.2 L/100km (45–55 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
No
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Smash 115
7.2/10
"Unbeatable urban commuter, just never mistake it for anything else."
Pros
+Genuinely bulletproof when maintained
+Exceptional fuel economy always
+Parts cheap and everywhere
Cons
−Struggles above 80kph badly
−Vibration on sustained highways
−Minimal braking performance overall
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
7.8/10
"Brilliant urban runabout that's overpriced but worth every penny."
Pros
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Legendary Honda reliability
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
Cons
−Underpowered on faster roads
−Suspension too soft overall
−Overpriced used market currently
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
