Suzuki Intruder 1400 vs Kawasaki Vulcan Classic 1500
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Intruder 1400 vs Kawasaki Vulcan Classic 1500. Suzuki Intruder 1400: 68 hp @ 4,700 rpm (estimated; Suzuki did not officially publish figures for all markets) hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated; note: varies by gearing and rider), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Kawasaki Vulcan Classic 1500: 68 hp @ 4,800 rpm hp, 309 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Intruder 1400
Kawasaki Vulcan Classic 1500
Horsepower (hp)
68 hp
68 hp
Torque (Nm)
103 Nm
118 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
261 kg
309 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
68 hp @ 4,700 rpm (estimated; Suzuki did not officially publish figures for all markets)
68 hp @ 4,800 rpm
Torque
103 Nm @ 3,200 rpm (estimated)
118 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
175 km/h (estimated; note: varies by gearing and rider)
175 km/h
Weight
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
309 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5–6.5 L/100km (approx. 15–18 km/L typical real-world average)
6.5 L/100km (approximately 15.4 km/L)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Intruder 1400
7.8/10
"An underrated, bulletproof cruiser that punches well above its price."
Pros
+Near-indestructible V-twin engine
+Massive low-end torque
+Parts still widely available
Cons
−Carbs need attention when neglected
−Soft suspension limits cornering confidence
−Long-distance seat comfort poor
Kawasaki Vulcan Classic 1500
7.8/10
"Reliable, characterful cruiser that genuinely embarrasses bikes costing twice as much."
Pros
+Bulletproof Kawasaki engine reliability
+Strong low-end torque delivery
+Parts widely available cheap
Cons
−Carb needs attention if neglected
−Chrome deteriorates and costs
−Heavy for newer riders
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
