Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Honda Xblade 160
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Honda Xblade 160. Suzuki Gixxer 150: ~14.8 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, ~135 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed ~125 km/h (estimated; note: varies by conditions and rider weight), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Honda Xblade 160: 13.4 hp @ 8,500 rpm hp, 142 kg (curb/kerb weight) weight, top speed ~120 km/h (estimated; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Gixxer 150
Honda Xblade 160
Horsepower (hp)
14.8 hp
13.4 hp
Torque (Nm)
14 Nm
14.7 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
125 km/h
120 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
135 kg
142 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
~14.8 hp @ 8,000 rpm
13.4 hp @ 8,500 rpm
Torque
~14 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
14.7 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
~125 km/h (estimated; note: varies by conditions and rider weight)
~120 km/h (estimated; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed)
Weight
~135 kg (curb/wet weight)
142 kg (curb/kerb weight)
Fuel
~2.8 L/100km (approx. 35–40 km/L real-world average)
Approximately 2.9 L/100km or ~34–36 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Gixxer 150
7.5/10
"Honest, stylish commuter that earns its used price most days."
Pros
+Fuel injection runs flawlessly
+Surprisingly sporty ergonomics
+Strong dealer parts availability
Cons
−Suspension too soft loaded
−Used prices rarely bargain
−Brakes lack confident bite
Honda Xblade 160
7.0/10
"Solid urban commuter hiding behind sporty looks that mostly deliver."
Pros
+Punchy fuel-injected engine
+Distinctive aggressive styling
+Strong Honda reliability record
Cons
−Rear shock deteriorates quickly
−Firm seat, long distances
−No ABS option available
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
