Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Yamaha Nmax 155
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Yamaha Nmax 155. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10. Yamaha Nmax 155: 15.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 127 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Burgman 200
Yamaha Nmax 155
Horsepower (hp)
18.5 hp
15.1 hp
Torque (Nm)
16 Nm
13.9 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
125 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
161 kg
127 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
15.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
13.9 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
125 km/h
Weight
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
127 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
2.4 L/100km or approximately 41 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Yamaha Nmax 155
7.8/10
"A smart, reliable urban weapon if you buy carefully."
Pros
+Bulletproof Blue Core engine
+Excellent underseat storage
+Composed, planted handling
Cons
−Front forks leak when neglected
−Plastics scratch embarrassingly easily
−Pillion comfort is mediocre
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
