Suzuki Burgman 200 vs Piaggio Carnaby 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Suzuki Burgman 200
Piaggio Carnaby 200
Horsepower (hp)
18.5 hp
15.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
16 Nm
17 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
115 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
161 kg
162 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
15.5 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
Torque
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
17 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
115 km/h (estimated)
Weight
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
162 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km or ~28.5 km/L (estimated real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Piaggio Carnaby 200
6.5/10
"A charming urban companion, but only buy a well-documented example."
Pros
+Genuinely comfortable riding position
+Excellent underseat storage capacity
+Premium build quality overall
Cons
−Aging electrics get troublesome
−Parts availability patchy
−Engine underwhelms on highways