Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Ktm 390 Duke
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Ktm 390 Duke. Royal Enfield Hunter 350: 20.2 hp @ 6,100 rpm hp, 181 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed ~130 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Ktm 390 Duke: 44 hp @ 9,000 rpm (2023+ model; earlier models ~43 hp) hp, 171 kg (wet/curb weight – 2023 model; earlier models approx. 169 kg) weight, top speed 167 km/h (est. – note: varies slightly by year/market), Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Ktm 390 Duke
Horsepower (hp)
20.2 hp
44 hp
Torque (Nm)
27 Nm
39 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
167 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
181 kg
171 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
20.2 hp @ 6,100 rpm
44 hp @ 9,000 rpm (2023+ model; earlier models ~43 hp)
Torque
27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
39 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h
167 km/h (est. – note: varies slightly by year/market)
Weight
181 kg (curb weight)
171 kg (wet/curb weight – 2023 model; earlier models approx. 169 kg)
Fuel
Approximately 2.8 L/100km or ~35 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5–4.5 L/100km (approx. 22–28 km/L, real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
7.5/10
"A genuinely sorted city bike if bought at the right price."
Pros
+Reliable J-series motor finally
+Excellent urban riding ergonomics
+Strong used value proposition
Cons
−Rust appears embarrassingly quickly
−Replacement panels cost too much
−Highway cruising feels strained
Ktm 390 Duke
8.0/10
"Brilliant urban weapon when bought carefully from a responsible previous owner."
Pros
+Savage power-to-weight ratio
+Excellent Bosch cornering ABS
+Sharp, adjustable WP suspension
Cons
−Fragile subframe cracks easily
−Vibration gets tiring long-distance
−Hard seat punishes after 45min
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
