Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar Ns200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Bajaj Pulsar Ns200
Horsepower (hp)
20.2 hp
24.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
27 Nm
18.74 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
136 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
181 kg
156 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
20.2 hp @ 6,100 rpm
24.5 hp @ 9,750 rpm
Torque
27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
18.74 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h
136 km/h
Weight
181 kg (curb weight)
156 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
Approximately 2.8 L/100km or ~35 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28-30 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
7.5/10
"A genuinely sorted city bike if bought at the right price."
Pros
+Reliable J-series motor finally
+Excellent urban riding ergonomics
+Strong used value proposition
Cons
−Rust appears embarrassingly quickly
−Replacement panels cost too much
−Highway cruising feels strained
Bajaj Pulsar Ns200
7.5/10
"A smart used buy if the service history is genuinely clean."
Pros
+Punchy motor, strong midrange
+Slipper clutch standard later models
+Solid perimeter frame chassis
Cons
−Oil neglect kills engines fast
−Exhaust header cracks easily
−Fork seals weep high mileage