Royal Enfield Himalayan 411 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Himalayan 411 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan. Royal Enfield Himalayan 411: 24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm hp, 199 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Royal Enfield Himalayan: 24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm (411cc variant); 40.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (450 variant) hp, 199 kg wet/curb weight (411cc variant); 196 kg (450 variant) weight, top speed 130 km/h (411cc variant, estimated; 450 variant approx. 160 km/h), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Himalayan 411
Royal Enfield Himalayan
Horsepower (hp)
24.3 hp
24.3 hp
Torque (Nm)
32 Nm
32 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
199 kg
199 kg
Type
Adventure
Adventure
Horsepower
24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm
24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm (411cc variant); 40.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (450 variant)
Torque
32 Nm @ 4,250 rpm
32 Nm @ 4,250 rpm (411cc variant); 40 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (450 variant)
Top Speed
130 km/h
130 km/h (411cc variant, estimated; 450 variant approx. 160 km/h)
Weight
199 kg (wet/curb weight)
199 kg wet/curb weight (411cc variant); 196 kg (450 variant)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28 km/L, real-world average for 411cc variant)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Himalayan 411
7.5/10
"Slow, characterful, and brilliantly capable where pavement ends."
Pros
+Cheap parts and servicing
+Genuinely capable off-road
+Massive aftermarket support
Cons
−Vibration loosens fasteners constantly
−Early ECU fueling issues
−Weak stock electrics
Royal Enfield Himalayan
7.0/10
"A flawed but loveable gateway drug to adventure riding."
Pros
+Ridiculously easy to ride
+Genuine off-road competence
+Low maintenance running costs
Cons
−Electrical gremlins bite hard
−Fork seals leak frequently
−Sluggish above 65mph
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
