Royal Enfield Electra 350 vs Triumph Speed Twin 900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Electra 350 vs Triumph Speed Twin 900. Royal Enfield Electra 350: approx. 18 hp @ 5,250 rpm (note: early cast-iron models rated lower, around 13-14 hp) hp, approx. 180-195 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approx. 110-120 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Triumph Speed Twin 900: 65 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 216 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Electra 350
Triumph Speed Twin 900
Horsepower (hp)
— hp
65 hp
Torque (Nm)
— Nm
80 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
— km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
— kg
216 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
approx. 18 hp @ 5,250 rpm (note: early cast-iron models rated lower, around 13-14 hp)
65 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
approx. 28 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
80 Nm @ 3,800 rpm
Top Speed
approx. 110-120 km/h (estimated)
185 km/h (estimated)
Weight
approx. 180-195 kg (wet/curb weight)
216 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
approx. 30-35 km/L (estimated real-world average)
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Electra 350
6.5/10
"Flawed but deeply lovable — buy the right example carefully."
Pros
+Bulletproof UCE engine core
+Cheap parts, easy servicing
+Effortless low-rev torque
Cons
−Chronic early electrical problems
−Oil leaks almost inevitable
−Brakes lack real bite
Triumph Speed Twin 900
7.8/10
"A characterful, honest middleweight that rewards everyday riders handsomely."
Pros
+Smooth, tractable parallel twin
+Genuinely handsome classic styling
+Comfortable all-day ergonomics
Cons
−Useless stock mirrors
−Early fueling roughness issue
−Switchgear feels budget-grade
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
