Royal Enfield Continental Gt 650 vs Moto Guzzi V7 Iii Racer
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Continental Gt 650 vs Moto Guzzi V7 Iii Racer. Royal Enfield Continental Gt 650: 47 hp @ 7,250 rpm hp, 198 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 161 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Moto Guzzi V7 Iii Racer: 52 hp @ 6,200 rpm hp, 209 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Continental Gt 650
Moto Guzzi V7 Iii Racer
Horsepower (hp)
47 hp
52 hp
Torque (Nm)
52 Nm
60 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
161 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
198 kg
209 kg
Type
Cafe-racer
Cafe-racer
Horsepower
47 hp @ 7,250 rpm
52 hp @ 6,200 rpm
Torque
52 Nm @ 5,250 rpm
60 Nm @ 4,900 rpm
Top Speed
161 km/h
175 km/h
Weight
198 kg (wet/curb weight)
209 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28 km/L typical real-world average)
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Continental Gt 650
7.8/10
"Underrated, underpriced, and properly fun — buy one confidently."
Pros
+Genuinely characterful parallel twin
+Harris-designed chassis handles well
+Incredibly affordable used prices
Cons
−Switchgear quality feels budget
−Electrical gremlins on neglected examples
−Limited wind protection at speed
Moto Guzzi V7 Iii Racer
7.5/10
"Buy it with your heart, maintain it with your head."
Pros
+Stunning retro cafe styling
+Engine essentially indestructible
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Oil leaks on neglected examples
−Genuinely underwhelming outright performance
−Bevel box maintenance often skipped
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
