Royal Enfield Bear 650 vs Fantic Caballero 700
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Bear 650 vs Fantic Caballero 700. Royal Enfield Bear 650: ~47 hp @ 7,150 rpm (estimated, based on 650 Twin engine) hp, ~202 kg wet/curb (estimated) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Fantic Caballero 700: ~80 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated, based on engine variant) hp, ~210 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Bear 650
Fantic Caballero 700
Horsepower (hp)
47 hp
80 hp
Torque (Nm)
52 Nm
67 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
202 kg
210 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
~47 hp @ 7,150 rpm (estimated, based on 650 Twin engine)
~80 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated, based on engine variant)
Torque
~52 Nm @ 5,250 rpm (estimated, based on 650 Twin engine)
~67 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
~185 km/h (estimated)
Weight
~202 kg wet/curb (estimated)
~210 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~4.5 L/100km / ~22 km/L (estimated, based on 650 Twin platform)
~5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Bear 650
7.5/10
"Charming, affordable middleweight that rewards diligent pre-purchase inspection."
Pros
+Torquey, accessible parallel twin
+Comfortable all-day ergonomics
+Strong used value retention
Cons
−Electrics need careful inspection
−Stock exhaust embarrassingly muted
−Switchgear feels noticeably cheap
Fantic Caballero 700
7.5/10
"A looker with a trustworthy heart — buy one with history."
Pros
+Reliable Enfield-derived engine
+Stunning Italian bodywork
+Marzocchi fork holds up
Cons
−Early subframe cracking issues
−Neglected suspension linkage bearings
−Rare, so prices hold firm
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
