Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Yamaha Fazer 250
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Yamaha Fazer 250. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Yamaha Fazer 250: 20 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 154 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 135 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Srk 400
Yamaha Fazer 250
Horsepower (hp)
42 hp
20 hp
Torque (Nm)
37 Nm
20.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
135 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
189 kg
154 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
20 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
20.5 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
135 km/h
Weight
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
154 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Yamaha Fazer 250
6.5/10
"Solid budget commuter, but don't expect thrills beyond city limits."
Pros
+Frugal fuel consumption
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Fairing blocks highway wind
Cons
−Narrow powerband needs revving
−Parts availability inconsistent
−Learner-damaged examples everywhere
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
