Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Kawasaki Ninja 400: 45 hp @ 10,000 rpm hp, 168 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Srk 400
Kawasaki Ninja 400
Horsepower (hp)
42 hp
45 hp
Torque (Nm)
37 Nm
38 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
189 kg
168 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
45 hp @ 10,000 rpm
Torque
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
38 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
175 km/h
Weight
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
168 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
3.7 L/100km (approx. 27 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Kawasaki Ninja 400
8.5/10
"The benchmark small-displacement bike that rewards riders of all experience levels."
Pros
+Genuinely engaging chassis dynamics
+Strong resale value retention
+Excellent real-world power delivery
Cons
−Used prices remain inflated
−Pillion comfort is poor
−Fairing repairs get expensive
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
