Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Cfmoto 450sr
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Cfmoto 450sr. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Cfmoto 450sr: 47 hp @ 9,750 rpm hp, 189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~180 km/h (estimated; note: not officially published by CFMoto), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Srk 400
Cfmoto 450sr
Horsepower (hp)
42 hp
47 hp
Torque (Nm)
37 Nm
43 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
180 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
189 kg
189 kg
Type
Sport
Supersport
Horsepower
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
47 hp @ 9,750 rpm
Torque
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
43 Nm @ 7,250 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
~180 km/h (estimated; note: not officially published by CFMoto)
Weight
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
189 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Cfmoto 450sr
7.5/10
"Brilliant bang-for-buck sportsbike if parts availability doesn't scare you."
Pros
+Brembo brakes punch above weight
+KYB suspension genuinely competent
+Strong parallel twin midrange
Cons
−Parts sourcing still problematic
−Traction control intervention clunky
−Fairing plastics feel budget-grade
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
