Qj Motor Sc300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Sc300 vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Qj Motor Sc300: ~35 hp @ 11,500 rpm (estimated, based on shared Benelli 302 platform) hp, ~175 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~155 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Sc300
Suzuki Burgman 200
Horsepower (hp)
35 hp
18.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
26 Nm
16 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
155 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
175 kg
161 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~35 hp @ 11,500 rpm (estimated, based on shared Benelli 302 platform)
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~26 Nm @ 9,000 rpm (estimated)
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
~155 km/h (estimated)
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
Weight
~175 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Estimated 4.5–5.5 L/100km (approx. 18–22 km/L) — best estimate, verify with owner data
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Sc300
6.5/10
"A capable budget naked if you're mechanically confident and patient."
Pros
+Smooth twin-cylinder engine
+Surprisingly capable electronics package
+Benelli-shared mechanical DNA
Cons
−Dealer network nearly nonexistent
−Soft stock suspension
−Switchgear feels cheap
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
