Piaggio Hexagon 250 vs Kymco Grandvista 250
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Piaggio Hexagon 250 vs Kymco Grandvista 250. Piaggio Hexagon 250: 20 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated hp, 175 kg (wet/curb weight) — estimated weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Kymco Grandvista 250: 18 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated) hp, 195 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Piaggio Hexagon 250
Kymco Grandvista 250
Horsepower (hp)
20 hp
18 hp
Torque (Nm)
20 Nm
20 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
125 km/h
125 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
175 kg
195 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
20 hp @ 8,000 rpm — estimated
18 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
Torque
20 Nm @ 6,500 rpm — estimated
20 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
125 km/h
125 km/h (estimated)
Weight
175 kg (wet/curb weight) — estimated
195 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L) — estimated
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (estimated real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Piaggio Hexagon 250
6.5/10
"Buy the best example you can afford, inspect everything twice."
Pros
+Generous underseat storage capacity
+Strong mid-range torque delivery
+Comfortable GT riding position
Cons
−Electrical reliability increasingly questionable
−Parts and specialists harder finding
−Cold-start carb issues common
Kymco Grandvista 250
6.0/10
"A capable budget commuter that demands realistic expectations and patient ownership."
Pros
+Generous under-seat storage
+Surprisingly effective wind protection
+Cheap to insure
Cons
−Scarce parts availability
−Vague high-speed handling
−Thin dealer support network
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
