Niu Nqi Gts Pro vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Niu Nqi Gts Pro vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Niu Nqi Gts Pro: 3.6 kW peak (~4.8 hp) @ N/A rpm (NOTE: electric motor, peak power rating used) hp, 108 kg (curb weight, BEST ESTIMATE — verify with official NIU specifications) weight, top speed 70 km/h (BEST ESTIMATE — speed-limited per market regulations), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Niu Nqi Gts Pro
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
3.6 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
80 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
70 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
108 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
3.6 kW peak (~4.8 hp) @ N/A rpm (NOTE: electric motor, peak power rating used)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
80 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant torque, BEST ESTIMATE)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
70 km/h (BEST ESTIMATE — speed-limited per market regulations)
175 km/h
Weight
108 kg (curb weight, BEST ESTIMATE — verify with official NIU specifications)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
N/A (electric) — estimated ~3-4 kWh/100km; range approximately 100-120 km per charge (BEST ESTIMATE — varies by riding conditions)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Niu Nqi Gts Pro
7.0/10
"Smart urban buy if the battery health stacks up."
Pros
+Genuinely usable urban range
+App telemetry actually useful
+Regen braking works brilliantly
Cons
−Battery degradation kills value
−Underdamped front suspension
−Awkward tyre sizing
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
