Kymco Racing 150 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco Racing 150 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Kymco Racing 150: 11 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, 118 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed 110 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco Racing 150
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
11 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
11 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
110 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
11 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
11 Nm @ 7,000 rpm (estimated)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
110 km/h (estimated)
175 km/h
Weight
118 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.5 L/100km or approximately 40 km/L (estimated real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Kymco Racing 150
6.5/10
"Solid urban commuter if bought cheap and inspected carefully."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Reliable engine when maintained
+Low seat height beginner-friendly
Cons
−Struggles above 65mph
−Carburetor issues when neglected
−Cheap plastics crack easily
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.









