Kymco Cv3 vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco Cv3 vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Kymco Cv3: ~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released) hp, ~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed) weight, top speed ~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production), Motoryk rating 6.8/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco Cv3
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
60 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
180 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
280 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; official specs not fully released)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production)
175 km/h
Weight
~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~5.0 L/100km (estimated, based on engine class; official figures not published for production model)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Kymco Cv3
6.8/10
"A clever used bargain if the front suspension checks out clean."
Pros
+Leaning front end genuinely works
+Strong new-price depreciation
+Practical all-weather commuter
Cons
−Thin parts and dealer network
−Front suspension inspection critical
−Styling divides opinion sharply
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
