Kawasaki Er-6n vs Honda Cb400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kawasaki Er-6n
Honda Cb400
Horsepower (hp)
72 hp
53 hp
Torque (Nm)
64 Nm
39 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
180 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
204 kg
175 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
72 hp @ 8,500 rpm
53 hp @ 11,000 rpm
Torque
64 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
39 Nm @ 9,500 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h
180 km/h
Weight
204 kg (wet/curb weight)
175 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L, typical real-world average)
4.5 L/100km or approximately 22 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Kawasaki Er-6n
7.8/10
"The smartest used middleweight buy under four grand, period."
Pros
+Strong low-end torque delivery
+Parts widely available everywhere
+Forgiving yet genuinely fun
Cons
−Stator charging failures common
−Wind protection nearly nonexistent
−Often abused by beginners
Honda Cb400
8.5/10
"The benchmark middleweight — buy the best example you can afford."
Pros
+VTEC system genuinely transforms character
+Bulletproof reliability when maintained
+Exceptional fit and finish
Cons
−VTEC solenoid fails expensively
−Parts sourcing can be difficult
−Grey import paperwork complications
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
