Husqvarna Fe 350 vs Yamaha Wr250f
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Husqvarna Fe 350 vs Yamaha Wr250f. Husqvarna Fe 350: ~45 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated) hp, 103 kg (wet/curb weight, approximate) weight, top speed ~145 km/h (estimated; off-road gearing limits top speed), Motoryk rating 8.5/10. Yamaha Wr250f: ~36 hp @ 12,500 rpm (estimated for post-2020 fuel-injected models) hp, 118 kg (wet/curb weight, 2020+ models) weight, top speed ~145 km/h (estimated; note: not intended as a road bike), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Husqvarna Fe 350
Yamaha Wr250f
Horsepower (hp)
45 hp
36 hp
Torque (Nm)
38 Nm
26 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
145 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
103 kg
118 kg
Type
Enduro
Enduro
Horsepower
~45 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated)
~36 hp @ 12,500 rpm (estimated for post-2020 fuel-injected models)
Torque
~38 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
~26 Nm @ 10,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~145 km/h (estimated; off-road gearing limits top speed)
~145 km/h (estimated; note: not intended as a road bike)
Weight
103 kg (wet/curb weight, approximate)
118 kg (wet/curb weight, 2020+ models)
Fuel
~4.5 L/100km (estimated real-world; varies greatly with terrain and riding style)
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated real-world off-road average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Husqvarna Fe 350
8.5/10
"Best all-round used enduro if you buy smart and verify history."
Pros
+Effortless power delivery
+Excellent suspension quality
+Lightweight and flickable
Cons
−Expensive maintenance intervals
−Worn linkage bearings common
−Fuel range embarrassingly short
Yamaha Wr250f
8.5/10
"The best used trail bike money can buy, if properly maintained."
Pros
+Wide-ratio gearbox is outstanding
+Genuinely lightweight and nimble
+Strong aftermarket parts support
Cons
−Valve checks every 25 hours
−Pre-2015 carb tuning fussy
−Higher ongoing maintenance costs
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
