Honda Xr 190l vs Kawasaki Klx 300
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Honda Xr 190l
Kawasaki Klx 300
Horsepower (hp)
16 hp
21 hp
Torque (Nm)
15 Nm
23 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
110 km/h
135 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
125 kg
134 kg
Type
Dual-sport
Dual-sport
Horsepower
~16 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
21 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish power figures for this model)
Torque
~15 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
23 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish torque figures for this model)
Top Speed
~110 km/h (estimated)
135 km/h (estimated; note: varies by rider weight and conditions)
Weight
~125 kg wet/curb weight (estimated)
134 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.5 L/100km or ~40 km/L (estimated, based on XR190S data)
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Honda Xr 190l
6.5/10
"Honest, cheap transportation that beginners will genuinely appreciate before inevitably upgrading."
Pros
+Near-indestructible engine reliability
+Parts everywhere, dirt cheap
+Excellent fuel economy
Cons
−Suspension punishes heavier riders
−Rear drum needs constant adjustment
−Quickly outgrown by progressing riders
Kawasaki Klx 300
8.0/10
"A genuinely capable dual-sport that rarely disappoints experienced or newer riders."
Pros
+Bulletproof fuel-injected engine
+Confidence-inspiring suspension tuning
+Low maintenance requirements overall
Cons
−Stubbornly holds resale value
−Limited wind protection touring
−Fork seals wear predictably
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
