Honda Xblade 160 vs Cfmoto 150nk
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Honda Xblade 160 vs Cfmoto 150nk. Honda Xblade 160: 13.4 hp @ 8,500 rpm hp, 142 kg (curb/kerb weight) weight, top speed ~120 km/h (estimated; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Cfmoto 150nk: 12.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, note: official figures vary slightly by market) hp, 138 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 110 km/h (estimated, note: may vary by market variant), Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Honda Xblade 160
Cfmoto 150nk
Horsepower (hp)
13.4 hp
12.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
14.7 Nm
12.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
120 km/h
110 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
142 kg
138 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
13.4 hp @ 8,500 rpm
12.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, note: official figures vary slightly by market)
Torque
14.7 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
12.5 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~120 km/h (estimated; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed)
110 km/h (estimated, note: may vary by market variant)
Weight
142 kg (curb/kerb weight)
138 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Approximately 2.9 L/100km or ~34–36 km/L (typical real-world average)
2.8 L/100km or approximately 35 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Honda Xblade 160
7.0/10
"Solid urban commuter hiding behind sporty looks that mostly deliver."
Pros
+Punchy fuel-injected engine
+Distinctive aggressive styling
+Strong Honda reliability record
Cons
−Rear shock deteriorates quickly
−Firm seat, long distances
−No ABS option available
Cfmoto 150nk
6.5/10
"Solid urban commuter if the service history checks out completely."
Pros
+Surprisingly solid build quality
+Excellent urban fuel economy
+Clean modern styling
Cons
−Vague, wallowing suspension
−Punishes maintenance neglect badly
−Limited highway capability
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
