Honda Livo 110 vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Honda Livo 110 vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub. Honda Livo 110: 8.25 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 110 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed ~90 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub: 8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm hp, 118 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed Approximately 95–100 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Honda Livo 110
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Horsepower (hp)
8.25 hp
8.8 hp
Torque (Nm)
9 Nm
11 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
90 km/h
95 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
110 kg
118 kg
Type
Commuter
Commuter
Horsepower
8.25 hp @ 7,500 rpm
8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
9.0 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
11 Nm @ 5,000 rpm
Top Speed
~90 km/h
Approximately 95–100 km/h
Weight
110 kg (curb weight)
118 kg (curb/wet weight)
Fuel
~2.2 L/100km or ~45 km/L (typical real-world average)
Approximately 1.8–2.2 L/100km (45–55 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Honda Livo 110
6.5/10
"Dependable urban workhorse, but expect zero riding excitement whatsoever."
Pros
+Near-indestructible Honda engine
+Cheap widespread parts availability
+Tubeless tyres standard
Cons
−Completely uninspiring to ride
−CBS feels wooden
−Suspension struggles with potholes
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
7.8/10
"Brilliant urban runabout that's overpriced but worth every penny."
Pros
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Legendary Honda reliability
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
Cons
−Underpowered on faster roads
−Suspension too soft overall
−Overpriced used market currently
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
