Harley-davidson Softail Fat Boy Lo vs Indian Scout
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Softail Fat Boy Lo vs Indian Scout. Harley-davidson Softail Fat Boy Lo: 67 hp @ 3,500 rpm (note: estimate based on Twin Cam 96 / 103 engine outputs; Harley-Davidson did not always publish official HP figures) hp, 317 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Indian Scout: 100 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 256 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Softail Fat Boy Lo
Indian Scout
Horsepower (hp)
67 hp
100 hp
Torque (Nm)
132 Nm
97 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
317 kg
256 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
67 hp @ 3,500 rpm (note: estimate based on Twin Cam 96 / 103 engine outputs; Harley-Davidson did not always publish official HP figures)
100 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
132 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
97 Nm @ 5,900 rpm
Top Speed
175 km/h (estimated)
185 km/h
Weight
317 kg (wet/curb weight)
256 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L) — typical real-world average
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L) — estimated real-world average
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Softail Fat Boy Lo
7.5/10
"A genuine head-turner that rewards patient, relaxed riders who plan accordingly."
Pros
+Seriously aggressive visual presence
+Low seat aids shorter riders
+Strong low-end torque
Cons
−Terrible heat management in traffic
−Limited cornering clearance
−Suspension too soft stock
Indian Scout
8.0/10
"A genuinely compelling used buy if you check the electrics first."
Pros
+Punchy low-end torque
+Head-turning authentic styling
+Bulletproof belt final drive
Cons
−Early charging system gremlins
−Cramped for tall riders
−Limited wind protection
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
